Opinion, false dendro dating reply

Dendrochronology or tree-ring dating is the scientific method of dating tree rings also called growth rings to the exact year they were formed. As well as dating them this can give data for dendroclimatology , the study of climate and atmospheric conditions during different periods in history from wood. Dendrochronology is useful for determining the precise age of samples, especially those that are too recent for radiocarbon dating , which always produces a range rather than an exact date. However, for a precise date of the death of the tree a full sample to the edge is needed, which most trimmed timber will not provide. It also gives data on the timing of events and rates of change in the environment most prominently climate and also in wood found in archaeology or works of art and architecture, such as old panel paintings. It is also used as a check in radiocarbon dating to calibrate radiocarbon ages.

The surprising but apparent trend is that the radiocarbon dates are a large number of years younger than the dendro dates. This strongly supports our hypothesis that West-Roman history and archaeology are conventionally dated too old by more than two hundred years, and that European dendrochronology was adapted to this error already in its early period. Read our new article here. In a new article in Dendrochronologia, Andreas Rzepecki with co-authors lift the lid on Ernst Hollstein's weak bridge over the Roman gap in the Central European oak chronology.

This issue has been taboo since the bridge was accepted by academia.

Dendro-dating can be a very effective although not foolproof way of creating data that can often lead to discerning the age of construction of various buildings and structures in the northeast and beyond. There are, however, certain criteria that must be satisfied or met in order that a wood testing on any particular building will yield good to. The appeal of dendrochronology as a dating tool is that it is objective and entirely independent of other evidence such as datable design features and documented information. Furthermore, where analysis results in a clear match with the master chronology the results are completely accurate and reliable.

However, the authors do not deliver any scientific proof for their assertion that the bridge is still valid. Our analysis shows that the generally used confidence levels for dendrochronological matches are still far too low to point out an unambiguous synchronous position. And in cases when a strong confidence level can not be reached with dendrochronology, the use of less resolved methods like radiocarbon, or even worse historical considerations, is still regarded an adequate procedure.

Read our new article Response to Rzepecki et al.

Jan 13,   Both teams arrived at the same conclusion regarding the overall dendro signal for the past years. Our reassessment confirms this conclusion, and demonstrates that both teams worked on a firm level of confidence when accepting dendrochronological matches. PLEASE. My Dendro Dating Service friend do not try to use money to get sex from women. There is a 37 year old man who has a child, and describes himself as an old fat balding ginger. He gets casual sex from many different attractive women on a regular basis/ Dendrochronology, or tree-ring dating, is the study of growth rings in deciduous trees to identify absolute dates of wooden objects. Tree rings are created by the tree as it grows in girth, and the width of a given tree ring is dependent on climate, so a stand of trees will all have a near-identical pattern of tree rings.

We also validate the supra-long Scots pine chronologies from northern Scandinavia using these tightened criteria and our crossdating software CDendro. The Finnish and Swedish pine chronologies were built by two concurrent teams of scientists working with wood from different places and with different methods. Both teams arrived at the same conclusion regarding the overall dendro signal for the past years. Our reassessment confirms this conclusion, and demonstrates that both teams worked on a firm level of confidence when accepting dendrochronological matches.

This validation is vital for the credibility of our hypothesis about general errors in the European oak masters, errors which were probably caused by using pre-dating with other methods in cases when sufficient dendrochronological confidence levels could not be reached.

Read more here. Cosmic abrupt radionuclide enrichment events provide a new exciting possibility for the exact dating and synchronization of organic samples or annually resolved sequences of organic samples using 14C measurement. Ice cores can be synchronized to the same events using 10Be measurement instead. The two globally assured events in and have already proved the worth of this concept. We propose that a third event has been spotted between and in bristlecone pine, perhaps together with another event ten years later between and By detecting that double-event in wood from the Belfast Long chronology it would be possible to once and for all time determine a definitive date for this European key oak chronology.

We also propose that Belfast Long has to be dated eight years earlier than conventionally assumed. This small offset would have far-reaching consequences for the internal linkage of the entire Belfast chronology, and moderate consequences for the radiocarbon calibration curve.

Tree-Ring Dating (Dendrochronology)

The Eastern Alpine Conifer Chronology is clearly synchronized with the European oak chronologies over the recent years, thus confirming the long established dendrochronological bridge over the "Roman gap" which we dispute. We claim that the European timber complex archaeologically anchored in Roman time is conventionally dated too old by years. But as the raw measurement data of the Alpine chronology is unpublished and unavailable we can not check whether our hypothesis is wrong, or the chronology is in error.

However, some "outliers" in data derived from the chronology seem to tilt the scales in our favor. Whilst it may be possible to date a single timber, two things have to be kept in mind - firstly, the chances of getting a date are far higher if multiple timbers are used, and secondly, how meaningful is the date for a single timber?

It may be a timber that is re-used, or had been stored before use, or it may be an undetected repair. If several timbers give dates within a few years of each other, one can have far more confidence that the whole structure has been securely dated.

Dendrochronology Used to Date Viking Longships

Then of course there is the question of the use of re-used timbers - these are usually apparent because of mortices and peg holes etc. It is rare for a large batch of timbers to be re-used as the only construction timbers, so multiple samples should pick up the different ages, but of course salvaged timbers have always been a valuable commodity, and dendrochronology can only date when the tree was growing.

The dendrochronologist would love to have end-grain cross-sections of timbers to see any abnormalities around the tree, avoid knots etc. Of course this is rarely possible in building timbers, unless ends are being sawn off in repair work etc.

More commonly, the dendrochronologist will want to take cores down the radius of what was the tree. This may mean going in at odd angles - and they will also want to core through sapwood remains as this ensures that one has reached the outermost rings of the tree.

Dendro dating

If no sapwood is available at all, it may be possible to date the ring-width series, but these will only give an end date after which the trees were felled. Most British dendrochronologists use 16mm diameter coring bits, leaving a hole about the size or slightly smaller than most peg holes.

The holes may be left open, or plugged with a dowel, and the plug itself may be left clearly visible or disguised to be almost invisible.

There are several arguments for and against each of these possibilities - these need to be discussed with regard to each study. What should I do if I want to get my house dated? The first thing to do is to take a look around for yourself. Whilst most timber-framed buildings are of oak, there is a lot elm and other species used. Sadly at present it is only oak that can be dated in most instances - although imported conifers may also be possible to date.

Not everyone can recognise the characteristics of different species of course - don't be afraid to ask!

MORE ANALYSIS

Another good starting point may be to look at the guidelines on dendrochronology produced by English Heritage and available free from the Scientific Dating Section, English Heritage, 23 Savile Row, London W1X 1AB - these give additional information on the background to the subject, practicalities of sampling, possible need for permission to core in Listed Buildings, help on interpreting any results produced etc.

You may also be able to determine roughly how many rings there are in your timbers - try looking at any end grain, perhaps in empty mortices or where timbers have shrunk in joints. If you get your eye in, it is possible to see the rings side on in unpainted timbers.

Also ask yourself if you can see any sapwood - usually more fragile and often different in texture and colour. Good places to look are in attics where the timbers are often less disturbed than elsewhere. Don't worry if you cannot do any of these, the dendrochronologist will be able to assess the potential of your timbers, but it may be a little expensive to get the professional to come and look and to say that they are sorry but your timbers are not suitable!

The problem of cost is difficult - it depends on so many things, location, access to timbers, number of phases of building to be looked at etc. This is probably best discussed directly when you first contact a dendrochronologist - but remember, a lot is involved, for every day spent taking samples in the building there is probably another full days spent preparing and measuring samples, analysing the results and writing a suitable report.

There are also the questions of specialist equipment, experience and insurance which don't come cheap! Some people like to charge per sample - I personally do not like this system as it encourages the person commissioning the work to have as few samples as possible taken, whereas the outline given above should convince you that the chances of success, and the interpretation of the results are both likely to benefit from a larger number of samples being taken.

Naturally there are questions of diminishing returns, aesthetic and structural considerations which will limit the number of samples too. A final plea. Yes dendrochronological dating can be expensive - but please, even if you cannot afford to consider such things now, remember, it is far easier to have the dendrochronologist in when work is being done on repair or renovation - it is so frustrating to hear that timbers where readily accessible six months again when work was being done.

Also - if timbers are being cut out for some reason, and they have more than fifty or so rings in cross-section, do label their origin and keep them safe for future possible study. Again, it is so frustrating to hear that the ends of all the rafters, or the beam taken out when that room was changed, was burnt or put in the skip etc.

Just a small slice, thick enough to hold together say 5cm or 2" is all you need to keep for each timber. Once the timber has gone it has gone for ever! About the author. Dr Martin Bridge has been involved in dendrochronology since starting his PhD studies in He has worked in New Zealand, Ireland and Newfoundland, but most of his work has involved dating historic timbers and studying tree rings in living trees in southern Britain and north-west France.

He has worked on the Mary Rose, and on trees felled at Kew Gardens. Tel: Website: www. Although we have taken great care to ensure that our information and advice is correct, we cannot accept any responsibility for any loss or damage incurred arising from the use of the information published on our web site.

Before committing yourself to any expenditure, you are advised to check any details and costs beforehand. All rights reserved. Reproduction of all or part of any article's text is illegal without the permission of the copyright holder.

Dendrochronology in Britain For a long time it was assumed that the complex maritime climate experienced in Britain would mean that we would not have these clear-cut patterns and that dating would not be possible. A final plea Yes dendrochronological dating can be expensive - but please, even if you cannot afford to consider such things now, remember, it is far easier to have the dendrochronologist in when work is being done on repair or renovation - it is so frustrating to hear that timbers where readily accessible six months again when work was being done.

About the author Dr Martin Bridge has been involved in dendrochronology since starting his PhD studies in Tel: Website: www. Disclaimer Although we have taken great care to ensure that our information and advice is correct, we cannot accept any responsibility for any loss or damage incurred arising from the use of the information published on our web site.

Discussion Forum.

Transsexual Escorts Information. Our goal is to help you search find a trusted and local shemale escort Scandinavian Dendro Dating in your susanneill.com the search box / There is a danger here of circularity however, dating on stylistic grounds alone can be way out on odd occasions, often by more than a century! What is involved in getting a dendro-date? The preference for multiple contemporaneous samples has been explained above. Dendrochronology or tree-ring dating is the scientific method of dating using the annual nature of tree growth in suitable tree species. Dendrochronology allows the exact calendar year in which each tree rings was formed to be established enabling the precise dating of trees and timbers.

Energy Saving Ideas.



Facebook twitter google_plus reddit linkedin

1 thoughts on “Dendro dating

Leave a Reply